Evidence Explorer

…as Rated Crew Momber....+..ssecee4d Years 6. Assigned BOcvccccnccasccndeducsceneeqeataat SAM Sq., Wsebdn. 7. Years in SOPVICS vcccccccccccecsccescece? LOGrs 8. Were Binoculars Used. .ccccccccccsesecesehO 9. Were Pictures TOROic ccs cedcccéieceeccesell ITI. RELIABILITY OF SOURCE: ist Lt. White is unknown to the undersigned, however he appeared to be attentive…

…ated Crew Member........ceccee4s Years 6. Assigned COccceccvcccsccecesecccesccoeee lio? SAM Sqde, Webdn. 7. Years in SOIVACO oo ccccccecccecvecescocet Years 8. Were Binoculars USSG cc caccecenccoesdereene 9. Were Pictures TORO c066 606cebeaceeecesanl Tii. RELIABILITY OF SOURCE: ist Lt. White is unknown to the undersigned, however he appeared to be attentive …

…Commanding Officer, Air Intelligence, Seott AFB, Ill. Dear Sir, Yesterday afternoon I, along with three others sighted several strange objects in the air. They were in controlled flight. We watched them for about 30 minutes. Please advise me if the Air Force is interested in such sightings. If so I will be happy to furnis a detailed description of our sighti…

… have vanished when it disappeared, Ze Object viewed with naked eye and through 7 X 50 binoculars, 4. All observers on premises of Tinker Air Force Base am all were within a radius of 2 miles. Object first reported slightly South and East of Base moving to directly over the Base, altitude estimated between 30,000 feet and 50,000 feet. 5e Observers believed t…

…the size of a pin anda peae There was just one object. There appeared to be some darker shade in the backgrounde There was no trail or exhaust. All the time we were watching it, it appeared to stay in one place. There was no speed or sound. It disappea red while I was rewinding the camera, The time was 18:5 and I observed it about ten (10) minutes. I viewed …

…inker object seemed — 2 . ar aha i eS 1 pen ey ~~ a be directly overhead. I couldn't estimate wt 2 I have been working in the control tower one-half (is) There were some scattered ¢ 4 was §& hour before sunset visibility about 15 miles. . ih 0 eS el P fia ie Cals i ae iis tens oe en on, ee I didn't take any photographs and didn't | 2 R. tn Beane o = J Og idn…

…d it about ten (10) minutes. I was watching it when it disappeared, I observed the object visually from the ground and I used binoculars. The binoculars I used were 7X50. With the natural eye it looked like a big tea cupe When I got the glasses on it, it looked like about 12" in diameter, The object was directly overhead (Tinker Air Force Base). I have been …

…ameter and it was round, There was no trail nor exhaust. It stood still for approximately five (5) mimtes and it seemed to disappear behind a cloud. The clouds were real highe I saw this object around 1915 and I watched it for about five (5) minutes. I am uncertain as to the exact time I went out to look at it. The object was visual from the ground. I used b…

… was no sound. The color was the same as a search light beam. It looked like a search light beam reflecting off a cloude I couldn't tell how many objects there were. When I saw these before, they were in the same localitye They looked like a search light crossing one another then all at once they would stop one on top of the other. I couldn't see any trail o…

…st altitude could not be determined, but appeared very much higher than the aircraft flying in the immediate vicinity. (NOTE: It is estimated that the aircraft were flying at an altitude of 2000 ft.) The maximum diameter of the object as observed by Peeler, was aprx & inches. It was also observed at this point that the object appeared to be spinning horizont…

… is a report of the incident as observed by the undersigned, in his own words. The report generally agrees with / Statements submitted by the two(2) airmen who were with the undersigned at the time the incident appeared, "On 9 July 1953, I A/2C Robert G. Peeler, was sitting on the 5th Street ramp of the base hospital, 3750th Medical Group, with A/2C Elmer C.…

…egen YOULTOM KEG abv 16 UNnru «<> power trans ii scope ana Sai that Lo Y : haaicat . 2 ear Tanac ay aa A sia Ba Waal LO on without bas KOU, color of sun. LLNeS Were VIiSLoLe Pie mi ORD FeO IPE A ENR is ie i a a nds aN he lh ss gil ol ts Des Le TS rel Lection LE & OTL alloon, MoOULMaACES BALULUUCsS . OL se! van! Pay | We q Li te eal Ng ping fall ia et Bo UMN …

…eliable; the reliability of the right scanner was not appraised. : 6. Taking into consideration various factors, it is Balke obarle that the reported sightings were jet aircraft viewed at considerable distance, or possibly that they were single-engine conventional aire?aft on local flight, viewed under conditions of “see ee which could have affected — sighti…

This document is a Skywatch Incident Report detailing a sighting of two UFOs near Baltimore on October 23, 2015.

This document is a request for information regarding access to investigative materials and the controls in place to prevent unauthorized release.

This document contains reports of multiple UAP sightings on January 5, 1986, involving various individuals and organizations. The sightings were reported at different times throughout the day, indicating a potential pattern of UAP activity.

A request for information regarding U.F.O. sighting materials from the Federal Aviation Administration, dated March 5, 1987.

This document is a memorandum of call, indicating a communication attempt with an unspecified organization or individual. The details are incomplete and do not provide substantial information regarding UAP/UFO matters.

This document appears to be a communication regarding a request for information related to an unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAP) incident in Alaska. The sender is addressing an FAA representative and mentions an information packet concerning the incident.

This document appears to be a standard memorandum of call, likely related to communication or appointment scheduling, but lacks specific details regarding UAP/UFO incidents.