Evidence Explorer

…p J. Klass to Paul Steucke of the FAA, discussing radar plot data related to the JAL1628 flight incident. Klass expresses gratitude for the data and shares his analysis of the flight path and the reported UFO sighting.

…by a Japan Air Lines flight crew over Alaska on November 17, 1986. The FAA could not confirm the sighting but investigated to ensure no safety hazards existed. Analysis revealed that the radar anomaly was a split return from the JAL aircraft, not another aircraft.

The FAA acknowledges its lack of resources and mandate to scientifically investigate UFO sightings, specifically referencing Japan Airlines flight 1628.

This document is a personnel statement from Anthony M. Wylie, a Quality Assurance Specialist at the FAA, regarding the radar data analysis of the JL1628 incident that occurred on November 18, 1986, near Fairbanks, Alaska. Wylie reports that he found no unusual radar targets associated with the sighting.

This document is a personnel statement from Anthony M. Wylie, a Quality Assurance Specialist at the Federal Aviation Administration, regarding the radar data analysis of an incident involving flight JL1628 near Fairbanks, Alaska, on November 18, 1986.

The document appears to be a fragmented and unclear record, possibly related to a technical analysis or report involving numerical data and measurements. The content lacks coherent context and is difficult to interpret.

…ar system, including time stamps, frequency, altitude, and other metrics. The data is fragmented and lacks clear context, suggesting it may be part of a larger analysis related to unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP).

…s and coordinates. The text is fragmented and contains references to multiple unidentified systems and measurements, suggesting a focus on radar or sensor data analysis.

This document appears to be a technical report related to radar data analysis, possibly concerning unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). It includes various subsystems and total counts, but the text is heavily corrupted and lacks coherent context.

This document discusses the analysis of radar data related to Japan Airlines flight 1628, which encountered uncorrelated radar signals during its flight on November 17, 1986. FAA experts explain the phenomenon of uncorrelated primary and beacon targets and its implications for radar tracking.

This document discusses the FAA's analysis of radar data related to Japan Airlines flight 1628, which reported an uncorrelated radar target during its flight on November 17, 1986. The FAA experts explained the phenomenon of uncorrelated primary and beacon targets and its implications for radar tracking.

The document discusses the analysis of radar data related to Japan Airlines flight 1628, which experienced uncorrelated radar signals during its flight on November 17, 1986. FAA experts explain the phenomenon of uncorrelated primary and beacon targets and its implications for radar tracking.

The FAA states it lacks the resources and mandate to scientifically investigate UFO sightings, including the case of Japan Airlines flight 1628. They have completed their investigation and do not intend to pursue it further.

This document discusses the FAA's analysis of radar data related to Japan Airlines flight 1628, which experienced uncorrelated radar signals during its flight on November 17, 1986. The FAA experts concluded that the radar system detected an 'uncorrelated primary and beacon target', a phenomenon that can occur under certain conditions, particularly when a pil…

This document outlines the involvement of various individuals and agencies in the investigation and evaluation of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) during the late 1940s.

This document outlines the procedures for analyzing UAP sightings, including data collection, statistical analysis, and consultations with various scientific and technical experts to determine the nature of reported incidents.

The document reviews various reports of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and provides an analysis of plausible explanations for these incidents, emphasizing the lack of definitive proof and the challenges in verifying sightings.

This document appears to be a preliminary analysis of UAP incidents, categorizing them based on the evidence available and their likelihood of being astronomical in nature. It suggests a classification system for incidents based on the degree of certainty regarding their explanations.

The document presents an analysis of UAP incidents, categorizing them based on the likelihood of conventional explanations. A significant number of incidents remain unexplained, suggesting a need for further investigation.

The document appears to be a fragmented analysis of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) with references to various probabilities and potential explanations for sightings, including astronomical and non-astronomical sources.