Other
Unclassified Complete
733667-001-022-0009
National Archives and Records Administration
Confidence
85%
Credibility
90%
View original document ↗ hosted at the official government source
Intelligence summary
This document discusses the FAA's analysis of radar data related to Japan Airlines flight 1628, which reported an uncorrelated radar target during its flight on November 17, 1986. The FAA experts explained the phenomenon of uncorrelated primary and beacon targets and its implications for radar tracking.
Tags & topics
Locations referenced
| Location | Context | Confidence | Supporting text |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlantic City, NJ | Incident Location | Medium | …ALS Radar data received by the FAA and used to track Japan Airlines flight 1628 on the night of the November 17, 1986, was retained by FAA. Review of this rada |
Extracted timeline
Jun 15, 1987
Document Date (year hint)
Document Date (year hint) for 733667-001-022-0009
Jun 16, 2026
Ingestion Date
Ingestion Date for 733667-001-022-0009
Jun 16, 2026
Document Record Date
Document Record Date for 733667-001-022-0009
Jun 16, 2026
Update Date
Update Date for 733667-001-022-0009
Entities mentioned
Full document text
1,755 characters, transcribed via OCR. Errors reflect the source scan. Compare with the original ↗
Paul Steucke
FAA Public Affairs
701 C Street, Box 14
Anch. AK 99513 March 5, 1987
SOSH d w/
(WIT Soy
UNCORRELATED RADAR SIGNALS
Radar data received by the FAA and used to track Japan Airlines flight 1628
on the night of the November 17, 1986, was retained by FAA. Review of this
radar data by FAA experts using identical equipment at the FAA's research
technical center in Atlantic City, New Jersey, revealed that the radar system
Was receiving what 1s called an "uncorrelated primary and beacon target".
This electronic phenomena is not unusual according to Steucke who said, "It
is unfortunate that the uncorrelated target phenomena occurred just when a
pilot was reporting seeing something outside his aircraft.
The controller's statements, released by the FAA, indicate that they thought
there might be another aircraft or object in the area of the JAL flight.
Steucke said, "The controllers were doing their job right because they have to
work with what is right there in front of them on the screen, especially when
you have a Captain that is reporting "other traffic" in his immediate area.
The radar data they had was one target, moving slowly across the radar screen.
They don't have the benefit of "monday morning quarterbacking" with multiple
radar images as was the case in regenerating the radar data." Review of the
radar data by FAA experts revealed the "uncorrelated target" phenomena.
FAA electronic technicians explained that an "uncorrelated primary and
beacon target" on the radar screen occurs when the radar energy that 1s sent up
toward the aircraft, (primary signal) returns to the radar receiver along with
the aircraft transponder (beacon) signal and the two do not match up as being
at the same exact location.
ft # #