Foia Release
Unknown Complete
23857122-0457-180273-0396
Confidence
1%
Credibility
1%
View original document ↗ hosted at the official government source
Locations referenced
| Location | Context | Confidence | Supporting text |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon, Idaho | Incident Location | Unresolved | …from the known flight path with respect to the place of reported incidents. So that your office-may make an independent analysis, three copies of the launching |
| Dayton, Ohio | Publication Location | Unresolved | …nication Cambridge 39, Mass. and envelope to the Commanding Officer and attention of following office symbol. ERH SUBJECT: Analysis of Project "Grudge" Reporte |
| Wright-Patterson Air Force Base | Publication Location | Unresolved | …Street April 18, 1919 both communication Cambridge 39, Mass. and envelope to the Commanding Officer and attention of following office symbol. ERH SUBJECT: Anal |
Full document text
2,390 characters, transcribed via OCR. Errors reflect the source scan. Compare with the original ↗
AIR MATERIEL COMMAND ACT/Bs
3160 Eleotronics Station
000 .92 Cambridge Field Station
In reply address | 230 Albany Street April 18, 1919
both communication Cambridge 39, Mass.
and envelope to the
Commanding Officer
and attention of
following office
symbol. ERH
SUBJECT: Analysis of Project "Grudge" Reported Incidents
TOs Commanding General
Air Materiel Command
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
Dayton, Ohio
ATTN; MCIAXO
1. Reference is made to the letters from your Headquarters to
this station of 22 November 1944S, 6 December 1948, and 14 January 1919,
Subjects: “Project 'Sign' ", requesting that reported incidents 1
through 172 be analyzed to determine whether or not these might have
been caused by balloons launched by these laboratories.
2. A listing has been compiled of all balloons launched by these
laboratories and its contractors for special atmospheric research pur-
poses, from the first such launching to No. 101 on 17 November 1948.
Each of these launchings has been compared with the reported incidents
l through 172. Factors of comparison were date of launching and date
of recovery with respect to date of reported incidents; place of launoh-
ing and place of recovery with respect to the place of reported in-
cidents, and possible deviations from the known flight path with respect
to the place of reported incidents. So that your office-may make an
independent analysis, three copies of the launching list are inclosed.
a. Incidents No. 5 through No. 16 reported on 4 July 1947
throughout Oregon, Idaho and Washington gave, in general, descriptions
of clusters or groups of objects. The 3 July 1947 balloon launching
No. 8 at Alamogordo was a cluster of balloons and was not recovered,
and so might be suspected of being the muse of these reports. However,
although not recovered, this flight was terminated in the New Mexico
Tularosa Valley only a few miles northwest of Alamogordo. That the
balloons were downed was determined both by airplane spotting and by
radio direotion finding upon the balloon telemetvring instruments.
Recovery of the balloons and instruments was prevented by the in-
passability of the terrain.
b. Balloon release No. 11 of 7 July 1947 could compare
with respect to date with incident No. 1 through No. 4, and again
with inoident No. 40. This balloon flight was again a cluster.
~
S=34560
Declassification Authority: NND 57565