Foia Release
Unknown Complete
23857122-0457-180273-0394
Confidence
1%
Credibility
1%
View original document ↗ hosted at the official government source
Full document text
2,909 characters, transcribed via OCR. Errors reflect the source scan. Compare with the original ↗
Ltr, ERH, to CG, AMC, Subj: Analysis of Proj. "Grudge" Reported Incidents
4. It is believed that certain of the items in the questionnaire
"Checklist-Unidentified Flying Objects” produce insignificant and un-
reliable data from an observer. These are; 9. Distance of object from
observer; ll. Altitude; 12. Speed; and 16. Size. For any unfamiliar
object beyond the focal range of the human eyes (about 60 ft.), these
four factors are mutually inter-dependent and therefore indeterminant
unless at least one of them (and some observed angles) are known.
Directly asking an observer about these indeterminants not only gets
unreliable data but induces wild answers because the observer is led
into making a statement about quantities for which he has no basis in
fact. He will unconsciously assume knowledge of some one of these
factors and so give incorrect information on all. That people (many
of whom should know better) will arbitrarily give answers to two sige
nificant figures on these questions, which really cannot be answered at
all, is proof of the unreliability of their information.
5. It is suggested that these four items on the questionnaire be
replaced by questions which will yield answers possible of being in-
dependent facts in terms of the observer's best estimates of angles and
time. From such data given by observers of the same object at two
different places, a reliable calculated estimate could be made of the
object's size, altitude, speed and path. These data should include;
a. An estimate of the angular size of the object. A quick
but reasonable estimate can be made by comparing the angle subtended
by the index finger held at arms length. The finger (7/%" wide) of
an average man held at 26" to 30" (arms length) will subtend an angle
of approximately two degrees. In this way angular size from about
1/2° to about S° oan be estimated.
be The range of the object's flight in terms of the angle
subtended by the observed path. If the object moves in a reasonably
straight course it is important to observe the position at the beginning
and the end of its course. After the flight has been completed a person
can extend his arms toward the two points and also at 90° or 150° and by
comparison estimate the angular extent of the flight. It is also im-
portant that information which will determine those directions relative
to a compass point be given. If the angular course is associated with
objects on the horizon, with roads, with the sur (if the time of day is
also noted) or by the north star, the orientation can be rechecked at
any later time.
c. The time required for the object to traverse the observed
course. This is probably the most difficult estimate to make. Timing
with a watch is the most satisfactory, but an observer is seldom pre-
pared to do so. Seconds can be counted with good accuracy by saying,
3 S = 314560
Declassification Authority: NND 57565