Foia Release
Unknown Complete
23857122-0457-180273-0393
Confidence
1%
Credibility
1%
View original document ↗ hosted at the official government source
Locations referenced
| Location | Context | Confidence | Supporting text |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hollister, CA | Incident Location | Medium | …either by its movement into the earth's sunset shadow or by natural defocusing of the observer's eyes. This incident § , could possibly have been balloon relea |
| Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico | Facility Location | Unresolved | …omparison with balloons launched by these Laboratories, 3. The balloons used by these Laboratories are now somewhat standardized. They are 20 feet long, plasti |
| Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico | Facility Location | Unresolved | …omparison with balloons launched by these Laboratories, 3. The balloons used by these Laboratories are now somewhat standardized. They are 20 feet long, plasti |
Full document text
2,745 characters, transcribed via OCR. Errors reflect the source scan. Compare with the original ↗
Ltr, ERH, to CG, ANC, Subjs Analysis of Proj. "Grudge" Reported Incidents
The description of incident No. 40 is inconsistent with the appearance
of balloon flight No. 11. Also, in consideratior of the prevailing
upper winds, it is very unlikely that the balloons would have gone more
than a few miles westward of Alamogordo, although it must be admitted
that a long flight west of the launching point could not be ruled out
as impossible.
ce Incident No. 7 compares somewhat in time with balloon
Launching No. 10 of 5 July 1947. However, balloon No. 10 although not
recovored Was known to have been downed northeast of Albuquerque, New
Mexico. It was not recovered due to impassability of terrain. Incident
No. 113 is a reasonable description of the 20 ft. plastic balloon and
instruments used by these laboratories. This incident was on the date
of balloon release No. 46 of 9 April 1948 at Alamogordo. However, the
time of the reported incident (1506 CST) is about i/2 hour before the
time of balloon release (1432 MST), thus the incident could not have
been that balloon.
de It is of interest to note that incident No. 122 was report-
ed by an employee of these Laboratories who had considerable experience
in the use of balloons of all kinds, and could have been depended upon
to know the appearance and behavior of a balloon if it was this he saw.
e. Incident No. 163 bears a fair description of the appearance
of a large plastic balloon in sunset light. The object's disappearance
could be accounted for either by its movement into the earth's sunset
shadow or by natural defocusing of the observer's eyes. This incident § ,
could possibly have been balloon release No. 75 or No. 76 or 20 and 21
July 48 from Alamogordo. Bulloon No. 75 was recovered at Hollister,
California, which is in the Monterey Bay area, on 22 July 1948 and could
have easily had a trajectory which would have been within sight of the
Los Angeles area. Balloon No. 76 was never recovered, It is possible
that it had a trajectory similar to No. 75.
f. All other reported incidents from 1 to 172 do not seem to
have reasonable comparison with balloons launched by these Laboratories,
3. The balloons used by these Laboratories are now somewhat
standardized. They are 20 feet long, plastic, white in color, and
hem sphereeon-cone in shape. Nearly all launchings are made at the
Holloman AFB at Alamogordo, New Mexico. Two photograph prints are in-
closed showing the appearance and size of these balloons. The larger
photograph shows the typical flight appearance at any altitudes where
it would be visible. It is hoped that this information may be of some
use to you in identifying future reports of incidents.
2 S =34,560
Declassification Authority: NND 57565