Other
Unclassified Complete
23857122-0457-180273-0109
National Archives and Records Administration
Confidence
85%
Credibility
80%
View original document ↗ hosted at the official government source
Intelligence summary
This document analyzes various reports of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) in relation to weather balloon releases in the vicinity of Shreveport and surrounding areas. It concludes that several sightings cannot be attributed to weather balloons based on wind patterns and observer reports.
Tags & topics
Locations referenced
| Location | Context | Confidence | Supporting text |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barksdale AFB | Military Location | Unresolved | Ko. 173: Rawinsonde released from Barksdale AFB at 1500 CST. Shreveport urder influence of very tight low of a local nature which extended through the 500 mb. l |
Entities mentioned
Full document text
2,146 characters, transcribed via OCR. Errors reflect the source scan. Compare with the original ↗
Ko. 173: Rawinsonde released from Barksdale AFB at 1500 CST.
Shreveport urder influence of very tight low of a local nature which
extended through the 500 mb. level. In all probability, rawinsonde
balloon path was ciroular following isobar curvature around Shreveport,
hence balloon was seen aD} oroximately two hours later in the same area.
Assuming a balloon leak, not altogether uncommon, the rawinsonde could
have remained low enough to be seen. Winds reported as high as 70K
account for speed. Conclusion; Rawinsonde balloon.
No. 174; Nearest pilot balloon sounding release was at Lake Charles
at 0300 GST. Viind flow WNW in lower levéls, changing to SSW with alti-
tude. Mo winds of high enough velocity to carry pilot balloon sounding
from Lake Charles to New Orleans in time interval were reported. Only
other release in the area was at Siloxi, North of New Orleans. Winds
aloft were WSW. Speed stated by observer of 300 NM.P.H. is approximately
15 times greater than any wind reported for that area. Conclusion; Not
a balloon.
No. 175: Pilot ballcon sounding released from Albuquerque at same
time as observation. Upper winds show WNW flow hence could ea have been
the AB balloon. Great differences of opinion exist as to speed and shape
of the object. One observer states that the object was not a weather
balloon. All evidence indicates that this is true. Conclusion; Nota
balloon.
No. ‘176s Navy rawinsonde and Weather Bureau pilot balloon sounding
were released approximately one ee pret to sighting. Wind fon howe
ever, was WNW at all levels from the surface to 15,000 feet which would
seem to prechude the possibility of either balloon drifting North to the
San Pablo area. Both witnesses also agree that the object was travelling
at high speed. Winds for that region did not exceed e5 K. Cone lusion;
No balloon.
No. 177: Crack-pot report; insufficient information to evaluate.
No, 178; No weather balloons were released in the vicinity on the
date mentioned.
No. 179: Crack-pot report; insufficient information to evaluate.
ee eed
No. 160; No date given hence no analysis possible.
Declassification Authority: NND 57565