Foia Release
Unclassified Complete
23857122-0457-180273-0107
National Archives and Records Administration
Confidence
85%
Credibility
80%
View original document ↗ hosted at the official government source
Intelligence summary
This document contains a series of observations and analyses regarding unidentified aerial phenomena, with a focus on distinguishing between potential weather balloons and other objects based on radar data and visual sightings.
Tags & topics
Entities mentioned
Full document text
2,206 characters, transcribed via OCR. Errors reflect the source scan. Compare with the original ↗
in. gne oO : : an :
reported at 30K at about 60° to 110°, Steadily rising is also in-
dicative of weather balloon.
Noe 1933: No date given; very little information; oamnot de-
termine object
termine object.
No. 194: Definite identity established by M.I.
3
No. 1953 Very little information, only radar pipe; cannot de-
termine If weather balloon or not.
NO» 196% Radar scope observation only; object travelling directly
z a vp 7 3 oO &
into wind. Cannot determine if balloon, but unlikely.
8 ry,
No. 197: Almost certainly the comet discovered by the Sydney
astronomer. No balloon could have reached a tain at the time the
ob ject was sighted inasmuch as the sighting time and release time
were almost simultaneous.
No. 198; No visual observation; radar blip moving at high speed
and constantly changing direction. If radar report is accurate,
couldn't possibly be a balloon.
No. 199: Wind, time and number of objects sighted rule out pos-
empntaanine ae
wo
sibility of weather balloons.
No. 2003; Definitely not weather balloon. Course southerly, wind
almost due North at all levels. Only station releasing balloon in this
area is North of Crescent City. )
No. 201; Pilot balloon sounding released from Azores station at
300 %. Time of sight "about" that time. Desoription sounds very much
ike lighted pilot balloon sounding. Only discrepancy is speed which
is reported from 25 M.P.H. to SOO M.P.H. If the lower speed is cor-
ect, object may be almost certainly assumed to be a weather balloon.
et ©
©
“4
No. 202: Time of sizhting was five hours after last scheduled
release tine for any rawin or pilot balloon sounding, thus discounting
a balloon leak, would put it far too high for easy sighting. Defin-
itely not a weather balloon.
Wo. 2043; Again last scheduled release was over five hours prior
to siphting. Only possibility, and a definitely unlikely one, is a
ighted balloon falling in flames from an extremely high altitude.
a
No. 20k: Venus.
ene ee)
=)
No. 205: No date given on this, therefore, impossible to check
wind flow pattern. Time, two hours after scheduled release time for
Kansas City, Columbia, and St. Louis, Mo. balloons.
Declassification Authority: NND 57565