Other Unclassified Complete

23857122-0457-180273-0098

National Archives and Records Administration

Released
Published
Added to archive
Jun 18, 2026
Department
National Archives and Records Administration
Original size
16.1 MB
External ID
a10ad9cee098c83a92a212dfe8504f8253da253c3e2947d1e75788ff2a89c59d
Confidence
75%
Credibility
70%

View original document ↗ hosted at the official government source

Intelligence summary

The document discusses observations of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and attempts to estimate their size and mass based on their motion and distance from observers. It suggests that the laws of mechanics could be applied to deduce characteristics of the objects observed.

Tags & topics

Estimation of Size and MassPhysics of MotionUAP Observations aerial phenomenaObservationPhysicsUAP

Entities mentioned

Full document text

2,673 characters, transcribed via OCR. Errors reflect the source scan. Compare with the original ↗

Suggest a correction
‘ fa r bs “ { > Tar +} obs 5 r Wa TO a 3 7 Lv FY 3+ "i AVE) A. ye 4° f- < 7 S zi \ C } WOLlC AU VLA J. Ah he UE IK a a Ul Oil’ SiZSs, i ay } ie - P joes =, d e Fa nae be ae r mor likely, Chey were Lar cnougn from the observers so that bin- ¢ a ot ee ee eee pe ee * ee oe en , ae a 4 1% ocular vision voroduced no stereoscopic effect; snis oniv means that they . Pe F 4 a" , ae ee Q ‘ +\ oe A = i were farther off than abo nirvty feet; c« 76 objec ere seen to adise YOe ar jei Yi CG Y*e 4 41) ls “nee oo UGS 2 T778 Apt . Yon > ~ N17 oe} + Ch bd IO A Go 4H ULS ma, WU SUL 2g WLVUUS < Woy \ if ASA S 2 = OTIOUSH 10 be visible a e ranges of those rec Ile objects. FF ss y Fe ee ra) “ 4 rn vio o & 2 OW LG 28 Ovuviously of prime importance to estinats the size and mass of thre observed objects. This may be possible to some exte e 3e i - n +}. - } . - r } r i pernissable As sume t 4) obe jaws of physics. Since the ob- ; ects have not bee bserv to produc r Sica ffects, other than . — , ee : ore ' att ~ g tke . antar< : : the one case i} iish a cloud was evaporated alongs + trajectory, it is , i : aoe ee ‘ oe 4 , SN i $ ye Pees ; cay eve 1 syattDein st a not certain that the laws of mechanics ? Or UNStance, would oe SULTICLENv. - 4 “ od _ 4 ee e i. oo 4 . * - = - P 4 2 - oo wt a But sunovose thst mechanical Laws alone are sufficient hen the PA} ony & S, : Of s ’ a Pa) ‘es : eS 3 following example is sufficient proof that at least a lencth could, ir ‘ ; principle, he determined: suppose a simple pendulum were observed suse ° oy @ ee 5. 43) Ae cr de 8 143] cn ct ras) rs hy 9 aa) ae Oo x $4] 4) Le | J f+ . ek ct cn a ry ) igi 2 & QQ Oo oOsci llation we could deduce from the laws of mechanics its vorecise lereth or This sureests that somethine could be deduced from the observed flutter- : ine motion of some of the objects of Group 1. Assume that we know the ange oes ular frequency and angular amplitude of this i a) measured ir principle from a motion picture). Then for purposes of calculation -} assume the object to be thirty feet in diameter, to be as rigid as a normal : BJ. 2 . n 5 x + : a " 5 ve " £ » fe ny 1 7 -, — on sircraft wing of 40 foot span, to be constructed of material of the ovtinu weichtestrenrth ratio and to be a structure of most efficient design. It is now possible to calculate how heavy the object must be merely to remain £ : ‘ ) “wal —. y on rat 4 = rn oe py eS a ae rigid under the observed anzulear motion. Let the caluclation be made 7 3 } . f 4 je Fs) ‘ ca a oo i cia ae ot Spee ; ‘ fe ay : ae Bia se ee for a plurality of assumed sizes 1, 2, 4, &, 16, 32, Gy -=--= up to say Declassification Authority: NND 57565