Other
Unclassified Complete
23857122-0457-180273-0098
National Archives and Records Administration
Confidence
75%
Credibility
70%
View original document ↗ hosted at the official government source
Intelligence summary
The document discusses observations of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and attempts to estimate their size and mass based on their motion and distance from observers. It suggests that the laws of mechanics could be applied to deduce characteristics of the objects observed.
Tags & topics
Entities mentioned
Full document text
2,673 characters, transcribed via OCR. Errors reflect the source scan. Compare with the original ↗
‘ fa r bs “ { > Tar +} obs 5 r Wa TO a 3 7 Lv FY 3+ "i AVE) A. ye 4° f- < 7
S zi \ C } WOLlC AU VLA J. Ah he UE IK a a Ul Oil’ SiZSs,
i ay } ie - P joes =, d e Fa nae be ae
r mor likely, Chey were Lar cnougn from the observers so that bin-
¢
a ot ee ee eee pe ee * ee oe en , ae a 4 1%
ocular vision voroduced no stereoscopic effect; snis oniv means that they
. Pe F 4 a" , ae ee Q ‘ +\ oe A = i
were farther off than abo nirvty feet; c« 76 objec ere seen to
adise YOe ar jei Yi CG Y*e 4 41) ls “nee oo UGS 2 T778 Apt . Yon > ~ N17 oe} +
Ch bd IO A Go 4H ULS ma, WU SUL 2g WLVUUS < Woy \ if ASA S 2 = OTIOUSH 10
be visible a e ranges of those rec Ile objects.
FF ss y Fe ee ra) “ 4 rn vio o & 2
OW LG 28 Ovuviously of prime importance to estinats the size and mass
of thre observed objects. This may be possible to some exte e 3e i
- n +}. - } . - r } r i
pernissable As sume t 4) obe jaws of physics. Since the ob-
;
ects have not bee bserv to produc r Sica ffects, other than
. — , ee : ore ' att ~ g tke . antar< : :
the one case i} iish a cloud was evaporated alongs + trajectory, it is
,
i : aoe ee ‘ oe 4 , SN i $ ye Pees ; cay eve 1 syattDein st a
not certain that the laws of mechanics ? Or UNStance, would oe SULTICLENv.
- 4 “ od _ 4 ee e i. oo 4 . * - = - P 4 2 - oo wt a
But sunovose thst mechanical Laws alone are sufficient hen the
PA} ony & S, : Of s ’ a Pa) ‘es : eS 3
following example is sufficient proof that at least a lencth could, ir
‘ ;
principle, he determined: suppose a simple pendulum were observed suse °
oy
@
ee
5.
43)
Ae
cr
de 8
143]
cn
ct
ras)
rs
hy
9
aa)
ae
Oo
x
$4]
4)
Le |
J
f+ .
ek
ct
cn
a
ry
)
igi 2
&
QQ
Oo
oOsci llation we
could deduce from the laws of mechanics its vorecise lereth
or
This sureests that somethine could be deduced from the observed flutter-
: ine motion of some of the objects of Group 1. Assume that we know the ange
oes
ular frequency and angular amplitude of this i
a)
measured ir principle from a motion picture). Then for purposes of calculation
-}
assume the object to be thirty feet in diameter, to be as rigid as a normal
: BJ. 2 . n 5 x + : a " 5 ve " £ » fe ny 1 7 -, — on
sircraft wing of 40 foot span, to be constructed of material of the ovtinu
weichtestrenrth ratio and to be a structure of most efficient design. It
is now possible to calculate how heavy the object must be merely to remain
£ : ‘ ) “wal —. y on rat 4 = rn oe py eS a ae
rigid under the observed anzulear motion. Let the caluclation be made
7 3 } . f 4 je
Fs) ‘ ca a oo i cia ae ot Spee ; ‘ fe ay : ae Bia se ee
for a plurality of assumed sizes 1, 2, 4, &, 16, 32, Gy -=--= up to say
Declassification Authority: NND 57565