Other
Unclassified Complete
23857122-0457-180273-0097
National Archives and Records Administration
Confidence
75%
Credibility
70%
View original document ↗ hosted at the official government source
Intelligence summary
The document discusses theoretical methods for counteracting gravity using electrically charged objects and the implications of such theories on gravitational forces and energy conservation.
Tags & topics
Entities mentioned
Full document text
2,173 characters, transcribed via OCR. Errors reflect the source scan. Compare with the original ↗
Thus even if the effect were larce enough to use it would still be un-
reliable and unpredictable.
METHOD III. Support of an Electrically Charred Object by Causing It to
Ngee oe mea
% 5
Move Transverse to the Earth's “Magnetic Field.
key
ae “ . Te : Kee ea oe tine Nee 2 Pe et ¢ : weve tive]:
© A positively charged body moving from West to Hast, or a negative
a v ei .
i4@, Vy Vo
charged body novine from East to West wili experience an upward force due
;
: ne PS 5 ae reas eee ae fete
at a spsed of ore kilometer/second
P
pound at the equator if charged to
obviously ridiculous.
various writers, perhaps first by H. & Wells,
that it mirsht be possible to construct a means of shielding a massive body
+e
u
2
AU e
toto,
, . ee Pe ae Suah & ae oe ae. eee 4 los Rece!
from the influence of gravity. Such an object would then flo Rece
@ there appeared in the press a notice that a prominent economist has
offered to supnort research on such an enterorise.
Obviously, conservation of energy demands that considerable energy
be riven the supported object in order to place it on the shield. However
be
$ : ~~,
rmnore it can 06
ct
ms
8a]
fee]
3
t
JF
+)
@
$
re)
t
i
™“
j
m
pote
i)
*
fe
es
<
try
a |
O
ae
ie
joe
cr
ge
<
®
e
te
“
~
y
B
rotten back when the object lands.
444 } z so sana oa * han pee ti
Aside from the fact that we have no suggestions as to how such a de
vice is to bea made, the various theories of general relativity all agree
ee) e
a : " eee e meer dee = jos ade py me + at4nn ara $y,
in assuming that sravitatioral fores and force dve to acceleration are 21
33 : Sten % Re he od + 3 < etsy san &h A un owriad rantate anartain
“distinguishable, and from this assumption the tneories pradisct cerva
> 4. «xs? ’ 2 ¢ 4. ‘“ aartan The aeornnt ion therefore 2 o \y oba Ly
8 g0TS Wich ae. Scag et ooservedc. ine G&S sgumpulo Sne rel or i186 procadsy
eS re ‘. aia yer oe eet See eo peoe or ga > thant ante bir maana of an
correct, and a corollary of it is essentially that only by means of an
e 2 sae © i‘ Tt s mar ib * - anat .t } 1¢
acceleration can gravity be counteracted. his we can successfully do
Declassification Authority: NND 57565