Other Unclassified Complete

23857122-0457-180273-0097

National Archives and Records Administration

Released
Published
Added to archive
Jun 18, 2026
Department
National Archives and Records Administration
Original size
15.9 MB
External ID
20c28696a0382ddaa062c39de391b96fead868fdf3f51606d2a7fc94a4e03449
Confidence
75%
Credibility
70%

View original document ↗ hosted at the official government source

Intelligence summary

The document discusses theoretical methods for counteracting gravity using electrically charged objects and the implications of such theories on gravitational forces and energy conservation.

Tags & topics

ElectromagnetismGravityTheoretical Physics Electromagnetic TheoryGravity ManipulationUAP

Entities mentioned

Full document text

2,173 characters, transcribed via OCR. Errors reflect the source scan. Compare with the original ↗

Suggest a correction
Thus even if the effect were larce enough to use it would still be un- reliable and unpredictable. METHOD III. Support of an Electrically Charred Object by Causing It to Ngee oe mea % 5 Move Transverse to the Earth's “Magnetic Field. key ae “ . Te : Kee ea oe tine Nee 2 Pe et ¢ : weve tive]: © A positively charged body moving from West to Hast, or a negative a v ei . i4@, Vy Vo charged body novine from East to West wili experience an upward force due ; : ne PS 5 ae reas eee ae fete at a spsed of ore kilometer/second P pound at the equator if charged to obviously ridiculous. various writers, perhaps first by H. & Wells, that it mirsht be possible to construct a means of shielding a massive body +e u 2 AU e toto, , . ee Pe ae Suah & ae oe ae. eee 4 los Rece! from the influence of gravity. Such an object would then flo Rece @ there appeared in the press a notice that a prominent economist has offered to supnort research on such an enterorise. Obviously, conservation of energy demands that considerable energy be riven the supported object in order to place it on the shield. However be $ : ~~, rmnore it can 06 ct ms 8a] fee] 3 t JF +) @ $ re) t i ™“ j m pote i) * fe es < try a | O ae ie joe cr ge < ® e te “ ~ y B rotten back when the object lands. 444 } z so sana oa * han pee ti Aside from the fact that we have no suggestions as to how such a de vice is to bea made, the various theories of general relativity all agree ee) e a : " eee e meer dee = jos ade py me + at4nn ara $y, in assuming that sravitatioral fores and force dve to acceleration are 21 33 : Sten % Re he od + 3 < etsy san &h A un owriad rantate anartain “distinguishable, and from this assumption the tneories pradisct cerva > 4. «xs? ’ 2 ¢ 4. ‘“ aartan The aeornnt ion therefore 2 o \y oba Ly 8 g0TS Wich ae. Scag et ooservedc. ine G&S sgumpulo Sne rel or i186 procadsy eS re ‘. aia yer oe eet See eo peoe or ga > thant ante bir maana of an correct, and a corollary of it is essentially that only by means of an e 2 sae © i‘ Tt s mar ib * - anat .t } 1¢ acceleration can gravity be counteracted. his we can successfully do Declassification Authority: NND 57565