23857122-0457-180273-0033

CTT 473 +" nd 2 uM SL Ve What, in particular, was gathered 5 2 recxKo statistical a hoax, S are duplicates, and 3 contain marizing the findings in ye 2 moa DK fieation are possible: first, all inoidents can be 1) those which under no stretch of as astronomical or extra-terrestrial (ext character of the objects incidents submitted, no information. be placed in one of the imagination can be r ra-terrestrial natural objects not RESULTS from the evidence con- observed? 7 are excluded from all ning: 1 is identified (in the subject report) as. In sum- the remaining 237, two systems of classi- two classes: @ garded throughout this investigation refers solely to originating 1h 3 - “an Pin x does not include space those which either are and 2) e w2wittoh mer 4 wate} ee ae 5 Suitable manipulation of cT object here is to segregate all cases in . s+ 4a ran is ro er <i ae ree a2 es h) Wit = Qe ae nomical orig indicated. When this 47,0, fall into the definit Pe versely stated, 126, or 53%, mizht though the likelihood of their being so extra-terrestrial or astronomical in is not important... fhe significant thing incidents might possibly be explained ast a lL I owe a 7 ae 4 - By yee * % a Nts . it i ‘ Declassification Authority: ships 4{wHitaler gt roanor saa 17 Lvealy aSctronomical construed as di ely non-astronomical category; honed ~ ee from other p) or oan by cn he fy, Suche tlhe which any vestige of astro- vision is a6, iii, or or, son- considered (al- small) as os 1 “ aa ai at g wa} ns ine @xact percentvags erniourn > ad NND 57565