733667-001-022-0012
AI Summary
The document analyzes radar data related to the JAL-1628 incident on November 18, 1986, where the pilot reported a UFO sighting. The analysis concludes that the radar returns were normal and did not indicate any unusual targets.
Key Findings
- 61 minutes of radar data analyzed from the JAL-1628 incident. - No abnormalities found in radar data that could correlate with the pilot's UFO sighting. - Radar returns categorized into three types: primary radar with beacon reply, beacon only, and beacon with radar reply. - 72% of replies were normal radar with beacon reinforcement. - 25% were beacon only, with 90% having a primary radar reply nearby. - Uncorrelated primary returns are common due to timing issues in radar systems.
OCR Text
ANALYSIS OF UNCORRELATED PRIMARY AND BEACON TARGETS (JAL-1628, 11/17/86 AKST) Approximately 61 minutes of data was extracted from the EARTS CDR printouts relating to the November 18 incident involving JAL-1628 and the alleged UFO sighting. Review of the data involving this incident did not show any abnormalities that could be associated with any type of target as indicated by the pilot of JAL-1628. Radar returns from the aircraft and surrounding terrain vary with the different segments of the flight, but are considered normal for the area. Returns relating to the incident can be categorized as three types: primary radar reinforced by a beacon reply (primary radar returns and beacon returns are both evident in the same 1/4 mile range cell), beacon only reply and beacon with an associated radar reply. Seventy-two percent of the replies were radar with beacon reinforcement (same range cell) which is normal for the Murphy dome radar system. Approximately 25 percent were beacon only and of those that registered as beacon only, 90 percent of those had a primary only reply within 1/8 of a mile, either ahead or behind the beacon target (5 behind, 42 ahead). G4 3/3/87 ‘3 These uncorrelated primary returns are not uncommon, due to the critical timing associated with the delay adjustments in the aircraft transponder for beacon systems and the target correlation circuitry within the radar equipment. When an aircraft is being interrogated as it passes through the beginning of adjacent range cells the intricate timing between the two systems very often is off just enough to declare both a beacon and a radar target in different range cells, resulting in uncorrelated radar replies. The data derived from the JAL-1628 flight is representative of the data from another aircraft in the same general area and is considered normal. February 25, 1987 PBS... R. Simantel ZAN-AAL-ARTCC COMCUR * uid + Wane /AAL-4OD
Metadata
- Agency
- —
- Classification
- UNCLASSIFIED
- Department
- National Archives and Records Administration
- Catalog source
- View NARA catalog record
NARA Source
- NAID
- 733667
- File
- 733667-001-022-0012.jpg
- Type
- image/jpeg
No machine-readable OCR text for this asset. Photographs without captions may have no extractable text.