Other
Unclassified Complete
733667-001-003-0022
National Archives and Records Administration
Confidence
85%
Credibility
90%
View original document ↗ hosted at the official government source
Intelligence summary
This document is a letter from the FAA responding to inquiries about the flight path of JAL Flight 1628, which encountered a UFO on November 17, 1986. The FAA confirms the flight path based on radar data and emphasizes their focus on airspace safety rather than UFO phenomena.
Tags & topics
Linked cases
Extracted timeline
Jun 15, 1987
Document Date (year hint)
Document Date (year hint) for 733667-001-003-0022
Jun 16, 2026
Ingestion Date
Ingestion Date for 733667-001-003-0022
Jun 16, 2026
Document Record Date
Document Record Date for 733667-001-003-0022
Jun 16, 2026
Update Date
Update Date for 733667-001-003-0022
Entities mentioned
Full document text
1,433 characters, transcribed via OCR. Errors reflect the source scan. Compare with the original ↗
A
US Department Alaskan Reaion "01 C Street. Euy 14
Of Transportation (907) 271-5296 Anchoraae, flecka
Federal! Aviation 99512
Administration
April 1, 1987
Mr. Philip J. Klass
404 N Street Southwest
Washington, D.C. 20024
Dear Mr. Klass:
In answer to your question regarding the correct flight path of JAL
Flight 1628 on November 17, 1986, the path marked on the aero chart is
the correct flight path. Our Air Traffic Division evaluation specialists
assure me that the flight path was charted from the recorded radar data.
Also, the transcription of communication between the air traffic controller
and the pilot shows that the controller (after JAL 1628 had changed altitude
and had done a 360° turn) said:
"Japan Air sixteen twenty eight heavy roger at your discretion proceed
direct Talkeetna Jay one two five Anchorage"
While we appreciate your offer to speak to our air traffic controllers on
the subject of UFO issues, the FAA in not concerned with UFO's per se.
The FAA's primary concern in all cases is the safety of the airspace.
The controller is expected to maintain separation of air traffic and to
determine whether any unauthorized aircraft is in the area. That is just
what the controllers did at the time of the JAL flight 1628 sighting.
The enclosed statement, "Lack of "Scientific' Investigation," explains
Our position on the matter.
Sincerely,
J. 3 Ways
Paul Steucke
Public Affairs Officer
Enclosure