Foia Release
Unclassified Complete
733667-001-003-0008
National Archives and Records Administration
Confidence
85%
Credibility
90%
View original document ↗ hosted at the official government source
Intelligence summary
This document discusses the unauthorized release of information regarding the JAL1628 flight incident that occurred on March 11, 1987. It highlights concerns about the integrity of the agency following premature disclosures.
Tags & topics
Locations referenced
| Location | Context | Confidence | Supporting text |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAA, Washington | Incident Location | Unresolved | ACTION: Release of Incident March 11, 1987 Information, JAL1628 PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICER, AAL-5 HARVEY B. SAFEER, ATS-1 : iF r Manager, Policy and Recommendation |
Extracted timeline
Mar 11, 1987
Incident Date
Incident Date for 733667-001-003-0008
Jun 15, 1987
Document Date (year hint)
Document Date (year hint) for 733667-001-003-0008
Jun 16, 2026
Ingestion Date
Ingestion Date for 733667-001-003-0008
Jun 16, 2026
Document Record Date
Document Record Date for 733667-001-003-0008
Jun 16, 2026
Update Date
Update Date for 733667-001-003-0008
Entities mentioned
Full document text
945 characters, transcribed via OCR. Errors reflect the source scan. Compare with the original ↗
ACTION: Release of Incident March 11, 1987
Information, JAL1628
PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICER, AAL-5
HARVEY B. SAFEER, ATS-1 : iF r
Manager, Policy and Recommendation Branch
FAA, Washington, D.C.
A Mr. Phillip Kiass, in a nationwide wire service news story
dated January 30, 1987, has stated that he reviewed a
complete copy of the transcript for the above flight, even
though the investigation of this incident had not been
completed and none of the information had been released to
the public or media.
The premature and unauthorized viewing and release of this
material with its subsequent publishing placed the agency in
the embarrassing position of having released information
which was being withheld from hundreds of other news media
correspondents. This type of release places the agencies
integrity in question and makes it extremely awkward for the
public affairs office to respond to those correspondents who
were denied the material.